ANÁLISE COMPARATIVA ENTRE CONCRETO ARMADO CONVENCIONAL E ALVENARIA ESTRUTURAL: VANTAGENS E DESVANTAGENS

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of two popular construction systems: reinforced concrete with conventional masonry and structural masonry. In the reinforced concrete system with conventional masonry, the structure of a building is composed of columns, beams, and reinforced concrete slabs. The walls, made with blocks (usually ceramic or concrete), serve only as partitions, dividing spaces without contributing to the structural support. In structural masonry, however, the walls themselves are responsible for bearing the building's weight. They function as structural elements, receiving the load from the slabs and distributing it to the foundations. The research examines aspects such as economy, sustainability, comfort, and design flexibility, using data from scientific articles and practical experiences. The results indicate that structural masonry stands out in terms of total cost and sustainability, although it presents limitations in post-construction customization. This study is relevant for construction professionals seeking efficient and sustainable alternatives in the development of residential projects.